<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Search Result Glitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seosean.com/blog/google-search-result-glitch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seosean.com/blog/google-search-result-glitch</link>
	<description>A blog about search engine optimization and internet marketing.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Storisperidot</title>
		<link>http://www.seosean.com/blog/google-search-result-glitch/comment-page-1#comment-16042</link>
		<dc:creator>Storisperidot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seosean.com/blog/?p=200#comment-16042</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed reading your post, keep up writing such exciting posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading your post, keep up writing such exciting posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOsean</title>
		<link>http://www.seosean.com/blog/google-search-result-glitch/comment-page-1#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOsean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seosean.com/blog/?p=200#comment-3985</guid>
		<description>Hi OnearmedSEO, yeah you're right on the date I should have looked at that. I corrected my post so it makes it more understandable that Searchology was just released. I've know that Universal Search has been around but just as you said I'm sure it has something to do with an adjustment or testing with either it or Searchology.

Anyways, it's been like that for a few days now and it still has not been corrected. Makes me wonder what else could be out and needs fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi OnearmedSEO, yeah you&#8217;re right on the date I should have looked at that. I corrected my post so it makes it more understandable that Searchology was just released. I&#8217;ve know that Universal Search has been around but just as you said I&#8217;m sure it has something to do with an adjustment or testing with either it or Searchology.</p>
<p>Anyways, it&#8217;s been like that for a few days now and it still has not been corrected. Makes me wonder what else could be out and needs fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OnearmedSEO</title>
		<link>http://www.seosean.com/blog/google-search-result-glitch/comment-page-1#comment-3907</link>
		<dc:creator>OnearmedSEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seosean.com/blog/?p=200#comment-3907</guid>
		<description>Is this an old post? Universal Search has been around for quite some time. Note the date on the Google blog of the post you linked to: 5/16/2007 04:19:00 PM
Posted by Marissa Mayer, VP Search Products &#38; User Experience.

It is possible that they were adjust or testing something when you noticed the glitch though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this an old post? Universal Search has been around for quite some time. Note the date on the Google blog of the post you linked to: 5/16/2007 04:19:00 PM<br />
Posted by Marissa Mayer, VP Search Products &amp; User Experience.</p>
<p>It is possible that they were adjust or testing something when you noticed the glitch though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
